market views

Seeking Clarity Through the Post-Election Haze

Frank Trotter | December 1, 2016 3 MIN READ

As I sit on a cross-country flight from San Francisco to Charlotte one week after the elections, I have an enforced five hours to both reflect on the past and hypothesize as to the future. Wichita, the heart of the 1930s dust bowl, is down below. Ongoing trade debates cast reminders of the depression-era Smoot Hawley legislation. And while not likely the direct cause of the Great Depression, this legislation most certainly amplified its depth. So, looking forward and no longer back, how can I parse the potential election result impacts, including what may change next on the economic front?

The Economic Here and Now

Recent statistical releases point to an economy that continues to sputter along. Growth, but not too much, shall likely continue, while many projects will be tabled, for now, in anticipation of policy proposals and shifts. The markets and commentators generally believe that the Federal Reserve will raise the target Fed Funds rate again in December. Meanwhile, the 10 Year U.S. Treasury Note is approaching last year's levels. In fact, many prices are in the same range as this time last year.

Looking back through 2016 shows a disastrous first month. By January 21, prices and values for most assets had fallen radically. Thereafter, a reset occurred with stocks, commodities, and other prices gaining though mid-year before generally leveling off.

Back to square one then? Maybe let's say 2016 didn't exist on the economic front and move on.

New Administration, New Unknowns

Like all campaigns, the incoming administration will bring with it an entire host of election-trail promises. I'll take a quick look at how these might turn out, with the overwhelming disclaimer that by the time you read this many things may have already changed.

I. Revenue and Expense
President-elect Trump appears to be standing by his pledge to generate over $1 trillion in infrastructure spending via roads, bridges, walls, and sidewalks. To this latter category, our little hamlet just completed a sidewalk project authorized by the 2009 spending supplement bill; a reminder that things might not happen overnight. He has also suggested increased military spending and a reduction in some business and personal tax rates.

All of this should provide for entertaining congressional battles:

  • First up will be the representatives concerned with the vector of the current deficit. Too high now in their opinion, and higher still based on the proposals. The likely outcome: not so much of either.
  • Next will be the pork barrel fight. Or the “it needs to be in my neighborhood” verse of the song. Congress and the Senate will fight long and hard to be sure that their own areas or states receive more than the folks next door.
  • Everyone loves a tax reduction, and it especially makes sense for corporations. Ideally, another year of repatriation should be included. Smart bettors would look for the riders in the bill opening and closing all sorts of Pandora's boxes along the way.

II. Trade
Trade, of course, falls largely—though not exclusively—to the executive branch. President-elect Trump's stance against free trade is well known. I mentioned Smoot-Hawley earlier as a cautionary note. Pure and simple, the math of free trade works. Protectionism, however, shifts the significant pain of some, heavily onto the shoulders of all, through higher prices and less choice. Smart bettors might look for more inflation here and a lot of global disruptions.

The most interesting fallout is far from clear. Implementing significant barriers globally may, on the one hand, allow China to dominate global trade for years to come. With the US dropping out of trade on a reciprocal basis, the door may open in a way that the central planners could only have dreamed of before. The economist's other hand thinks that this may be the string of events that collectively pops the Chinese bubble. I am not convinced I like either outcome.

We have mentioned in these pages many times before that investors prefer a solid base case, including a significant dose of certainty. Speculators, on the other hand, love periods of turmoil. Opportunity knocks.

With most of pricing reset near the same levels as a year ago, we look forward to seeing a lot more detail about what will be proposed, and what will likely be accepted.

Until next time—good investing.

Frank Trotter
Frank Trotter
Executive Vice President, Chairman Global Markets
Frank Trotter
Frank Trotter
Executive Vice President, Chairman Global Markets
Frank has over 35 years of experience in banking and global markets. When not in the office, you might find him speaking on the financial conference circuit, giving an interview on the latest world economic news, or at the nearest ice rink playing pick-up hockey.

All statements, comments and opinions expressed are solely those of the writer or speaker and are not the statements, comments or opinions of EverBank or of any of its affiliates, and are subject to change without notice. Due to the rapidly changing nature of currency and commodities markets, any statement, comment, or opinion may quickly become outdated. This is not a solicitation for the purchase or sale of any securities or options on securities or for the purchase or sale of a currency or any precious metal, and it does not constitute a recommendation to you or to any specific person of any particular action. EverBank, its officers and employees do not provide investment or other types of advice. All factual information has been obtained from sources that the writer or speaker believed to be reliable, but the accuracy, completeness, and interpretation of the factual information is not guaranteed and has not been independently verified. Not all products are right for everyone. You should conduct your own research and/or consult your advisor before making any purchases.